The Pros and Cons
Pros
-
The taxpayer (through the BLM) gets over 5,100 acres of land in exchange for approximately 4,900 acres (total acreages in the final exchange will be determined through the valuation process).
-
The public secures permanent and indisputable roadway access to the Breaks Monument.
-
Thousands of Montanans and visitors can enjoy new or improved access to over 70,000 acres of currently inaccessible or very difficult to reach public land.
-
The exchange provides timely access to important recreational and hunting ground within the Breaks National Monument – one of BLM’s top priorities in Montana.
-
The public does not lose a single acre of roadway-accessible public land.
-
The exchange avoids the need to construct a new, duplicative, expensive and environmentally destructive roadway through a national monument.
-
The exchange is consistent with BLM’s public policy goals to “increase/improve public access to public lands through acquisitions, exchanges, [and] partnerships ...”
-
Public land consolidation improves efficiency and cost effectiveness of land management for the BLM and taxpayer.
-
Collaboration with the NBar and Anchor Ranches provides greatly enhanced opportunity for wildlife management.
Cons
-
Approximately 40 to 60 hunters each year, who currently fly or charter aircraft into the Durfee Hills, will have to ask permission to hunt on private land.